Institutes of the Christian Religion (Vol. 2 of 2)
The Power Of Legislation, In Which The Pope And His Adherents Have Most Cruelly Tyrannized Over The Minds, And Tortured The Bodies, Of Men - Reading 01
CHAPTER X.
THE POWER OF LEGISLATION, IN WHICH THE POPE AND HIS ADHERENTS HAVE MOST CRUELLY TYRANNIZED OVER THE MINDS, AND TORTURED THE BODIES, OF MEN.
We now proceed to the second branch of the power of the
Church, which the Romanists represent as consisting in legislation—a
source from which have issued innumerable human
traditions, the most pestilent and fatal to wretched souls. For
they have made no more scruple than the scribes and Pharisees
to “lay on other men’s shoulders burdens which they themselves
would not touch with one of their fingers.”[973]
I have shown
in another place the extreme cruelty of their injunctions concerning
auricular confession. None of their other laws discover
such enormous violence; but those which appear the most tolerable
of them all, are tyrannically oppressive to the conscience.
I forbear to remark how they adulterate the worship of God,
and despoil God himself, who is the sole Legislator, of the
right which belongs to him. This power is now to be examined—whether
the Church has authority to make laws which
shall bind the consciences of men. This question has nothing
to do with political order; the only objects of our present
attention are, that God may be rightly worshipped according
to the rule he has prescribed, and that our spiritual liberty
which relates to God may be preserved entire. Whatever
edicts have been issued by men respecting the worship of God,
independently of his word, it has been customary to call
human traditions. Against such laws we contend, and not
against the holy and useful constitutions of the Church, which
contribute to the preservation of discipline, or integrity, or peace.
The object for which we contend, is, to restrain that overgrown
and barbarous empire, which is usurped over men’s souls by
those who wish to be accounted the pastors of the Church, but
who in reality are its most savage butchers. For they say
that the laws which they make are spiritual, pertaining to the
soul, and they affirm them to be necessary to eternal life. Thus,
as I have lately hinted, the kingdom of Christ is invaded;
thus the liberty given by him to the consciences of believers
is altogether subverted and destroyed. I forbear to remark at
present with what great impiety they enforce the observance
of their laws, while they teach men to seek the pardon of their
sins and righteousness and salvation from it, and while they
make the whole of religion and piety to consist in it. I only
contend for this one point, that no necessity ought to be imposed
upon consciences in things in which they have been set
at liberty by Christ; and without this liberty, as I have before
observed, they can have no peace with God. They must
acknowledge Christ their Deliverer as their only King, and
must be governed by one law of liberty, even the sacred word
of the gospel, if they wish to retain the grace which they have
once obtained in Christ; they must submit to no slavery; they
must be fettered by no bonds.
II. These sapient legislators, indeed, pretend that their constitutions
are laws of liberty, an easy yoke, a light burden.
But who does not see that these are gross falsehoods? The
hardship of their laws is not at all felt by themselves, who
have rejected the fear of God, and securely and boldly disregard
all laws, human and divine. But persons who are impressed
with any concern for their salvation, are far from considering
themselves at liberty as long as they are entangled in
these snares. We see what great caution Paul used in this
respect, to avoid “casting a snare upon” men in a single instance;[974]
and that not without cause; for he saw what a
deep wound would be made in their consciences, by the imposition
of any necessity upon them in those things in which
the Lord had left them at liberty. On the contrary, it is
scarcely possible to enumerate the constitutions, which these
men have most rigorously enforced with the denunciation of
eternal death, and which they require to be most minutely
observed as necessary to salvation. Among these, there are
many exceedingly difficult to be fulfilled; but when they are
all collected together in one body, so immense is the accumulation,
the observance of the whole is utterly impracticable.
How, then, can it be possible for those who are loaded with
such a vast weight of difficulty, not to be perplexed and tortured
with extreme anxiety and terror? My design at present,
then, is, to oppose constitutions of this kind, which tend to bind
souls internally before God, and to fill them with scruples, as
if they enjoined things necessary to salvation.
III. The generality of men, therefore, are embarrassed with
this question, for want of distinguishing with sufficient exactness
between the outward judgment of men and the court of
conscience. The difficulty is increased by the injunction of
Paul, that the magistrate is to be obeyed, “not only for wrath,
but also for conscience’ sake;”[975]
whence it follows, that
consciences are bound by political laws. If this were the
case, all that we said in the last chapter, and are about to
say in this, on the subject of spiritual government, would
fall to the ground. To solve this difficulty, it is first of all
necessary to understand what is conscience. The definition
may be derived from the etymology of the word. Science, or
knowledge, is the apprehension which men have of things in
their mind and understanding. So, when they have an apprehension
of the judgment of God, as a witness that suffers them
not to conceal their sins, but forces them as criminals before
the tribunal of the judge, this apprehension is called conscience.
For it is something between God and man, which permits not
a man to suppress what he knows within himself, but pursues
him till it brings him to a sense of his guilt. This is what
Paul means, when he speaks of men’s “conscience also bearing
witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing, or
else excusing, one another”[976]
before God. A simple knowledge
might remain in man, as it were, in a state of concealment.
Therefore this sentiment, which places men before the
tribunal of God, is like a keeper appointed over man to watch
and observe all his secrets, that nothing may remain buried in
darkness. Hence that old proverb, that conscience is equal to
a thousand witnesses. For the same reason, Peter speaks of
“the answer of a good conscience towards God,”[977]
to denote
our tranquillity of mind, when, persuaded of the grace of Christ,
we present ourselves before God without fear. And the author
of the Epistle to the Hebrews speaks of persons “having no
more conscience of sins,”[978]
to signify their being liberated,
or absolved, so as to feel no more remorse or compunction
for sin.