Institutes of the Christian Religion (Vol. 2 of 2)
CHAPTER I.08
The True Church, And The Necessity Of Our Union With Her, Being The Mother Of All The Pious - Reading 08
XVII. When they allege that there must be some reason
why the Church is said to be holy, it is necessary to examine
the holiness in which it excels; lest by refusing to admit the
existence of a Church without absolute and sinless perfection,
we should leave no Church in the world. It is true, that, as
Paul tells us, “Christ loved the Church, and gave himself for
it, that he might sanctify and cleanse it, by the washing of water
by the word, that he might present it to himself a glorious
Church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing.” [754] [755] [756] [757] [758]
XVIII. Of this truth Christ himself, the apostles, and almost all the prophets, have given us an example. Dreadful are those descriptions in which Isaiah, Jeremiah, Joel, Habakkuk, and others, deplore the disorders of the Church of Jerusalem. There was such general and extreme corruption in the people, in the magistrates, and in the priests, that Isaiah does not hesitate to compare Jerusalem to Sodom and Gomorrah. Religion was partly despised, partly corrupted. Their manners were generally disgraced by thefts, robberies, treacheries, murders, and similar crimes. Nevertheless, the prophets on this account neither raised themselves new churches, nor built new altars for the oblation of separate sacrifices; but whatever were the characters of the people, yet because they considered that God had deposited his word among that nation, and instituted the ceremonies in which he was there worshipped, they lifted up pure hands to him even in the congregation of the impious. If they had thought that they contracted any contagion from these services, surely they would have suffered a hundred deaths rather than have permitted themselves to be dragged to them. There was nothing therefore to prevent their departure from them, but the desire of preserving the unity of the Church. But if the holy prophets were restrained by a sense of duty from forsaking the Church on account of the numerous and enormous crimes which were practised, not by a few individuals, but almost by the whole nation,—it is extreme arrogance in us, if we presume immediately to withdraw from the communion of a Church where the conduct of all the members is not compatible either with our judgment, or even with the Christian profession.
XIX. Now, what kind of an age was that of Christ and his apostles? Yet the desperate impiety of the Pharisees, and the dissolute lives every where led by the people, could not prevent them from using the same sacrifices, and assembling in the same temple with others, for the public exercises of religion. How did this happen, but from a knowledge that the society of the wicked could not contaminate those who with pure consciences united with them in the same solemnities? If any one pay no deference to the prophets and apostles, let him at least acquiesce in the authority of Christ. Cyprian has excellently remarked, “Although tares, or impure vessels, are found in the Church, yet this is not a reason why we should withdraw from it. It only behoves us to labour that we may be the wheat, and to use our utmost endeavours and exertions, that we may be vessels of gold or of silver. But to break in pieces the vessels of earth belongs to the Lord alone, to whom a rod of iron is also given. Nor let any one arrogate to himself what is exclusively the province of the Son of God, by pretending to fan the floor, clear away the chaff, and separate all the tares by the judgment of man. This is proud obstinacy and sacrilegious presumption, originating in a corrupt frenzy.” Let these two points, then, be considered as decided; first, that he who voluntarily deserts the external communion of the Church where the word of God is preached, and the sacraments are administered, is without any excuse; secondly, that the faults either of few persons or of many, form no obstacles to a due profession of our faith in the use of the ceremonies instituted by God; because the pious conscience is not wounded by the unworthiness of any other individual, whether he be a pastor or a private person; nor are the mysteries less pure and salutary to a holy and upright man, because they are received at the same time by the impure.
XX. Their severity and haughtiness go to still greater
lengths. Acknowledging no church but such as is pure from
the smallest blemishes, they are even angry with honest teachers,
because, by exhorting believers to progressive improvements,
they teach them to groan under the burden of sins, and to seek
for pardon all their lifetime. For hereby, they pretend, the
people are drawn away from perfection. I confess, that in
urging men to perfection, we ought to labour with unremitting
ardour and diligence; but to inspire their minds with a persuasion
that they have already attained it, while they are
yet in the pursuit of it, I maintain to be a diabolical invention.
Therefore, in the Creed, the communion of saints is immediately
followed by the forgiveness of sins, which can only be
obtained by the citizens and members of the Church, as we
read in the prophet. [759] [760] [761]