Institutes of the Christian Religion (Vol. 2 of 2)
Eternal Election, Or God’S Predestination Of Some To Salvation, And Of Others To Destruction - Reading 03
V. Predestination, by which God adopts some to the hope
of life, and adjudges others to eternal death, no one, desirous
of the credit of piety, dares absolutely to deny. But it is involved
in many cavils, especially by those who make foreknowledge
the cause of it. We maintain, that both belong to
God; but it is preposterous to represent one as dependent on
the other. When we attribute foreknowledge to God, we mean
that all things have ever been, and perpetually remain, before
his eyes, so that to his knowledge nothing is future or past, but
all things are present; and present in such a manner, that he
does not merely conceive of them from ideas formed in his
mind, as things remembered by us appear present to our minds,
but really beholds and sees them as if actually placed before him.
And this foreknowledge extends to the whole world, and to all
the creatures. Predestination we call the eternal decree of
God, by which he has determined in himself, what he would
have to become of every individual of mankind. For they are
not all created with a similar destiny; but eternal life is fore-ordained
for some, and eternal damnation for others. Every
man, therefore, being created for one or the other of these ends,
we say, he is predestinated either to life or to death. This God
has not only testified in particular persons, but has given a
specimen of it in the whole posterity of Abraham, which should
evidently show the future condition of every nation to depend
upon his decision. “When the Most High divided the nations,
when he separated the sons of Adam, the Lord’s portion was
his people; Jacob was the lot of his inheritance.”[444]
The
separation is before the eyes of all: in the person of Abraham,
as in the dry trunk of a tree, one people is peculiarly chosen
to the rejection of others: no reason for this appears, except
that Moses, to deprive their posterity of all occasion of glorying,
teaches them that their exaltation is wholly from God’s gratuitous
love. He assigns this reason for their deliverance, that
“he loved their fathers, and chose their seed after them.”[445]
More fully in another chapter: “The Lord did not set his love
upon you, nor choose you, because you were more in number
than any people; but because the Lord loved you.”[446]
He
frequently repeats the same admonition: “Behold, the heaven
is the Lord’s thy God, the earth also, with all that therein is.
Only the Lord had a delight in thy fathers to love them, and
he chose their seed after them.”[447]
In another place, sanctification
is enjoined upon them, because they were chosen to
be a peculiar people.[448]
And again, elsewhere, love is asserted
to be the cause of their protection. It is declared by the united
voice of the faithful, “He hath chosen our inheritance for us,
the excellency of Jacob, whom he loved.”[449]
For the gifts
conferred on them by God, they all ascribe to gratuitous love,
not only from a consciousness that these were not obtained by
any merit of theirs, but from a conviction, that the holy patriarch
himself was not endued with such excellence as to acquire
the privilege of so great an honour for himself and his posterity.
And the more effectually to demolish all pride, he
reproaches them with having deserved no favour, being “a stiff-necked
and rebellious people.”[450]
The prophets also frequently
reproach the Jews with the unwelcome mention of this
election, because they had shamefully departed from it. Let
them, however, now come forward, who wish to restrict the
election of God to the desert of men, or the merit of works.
When they see one nation preferred to all others,—when they
hear that God had no inducement to be more favourable to a
few, and ignoble, and even disobedient and obstinate people,—will
they quarrel with him because he has chosen to give such
an example of mercy? But their obstreperous clamours will
not impede his work, nor will the reproaches they hurl against
Heaven, injure or affect his justice; they will rather recoil
upon their own heads. To this principle of the gracious covenant,
the Israelites are also recalled whenever thanks are to
be rendered to God, or their hopes are to be raised for futurity.
“He hath made us, and not we ourselves,” says the Psalmist:
“we are his people, and the sheep of his pasture.”[451]
It is not
without reason that the negation is added, “not we ourselves,”
that they may know that of all the benefits they enjoy, God is
not only the Author, but derived the cause from himself, there
being nothing in them deserving of such great honour. He
also enjoins them to be content with the mere good pleasure
of God, in these words: “O ye seed of Abraham his servant,
ye children of Jacob his chosen.” And after having recounted
the continual benefits bestowed by God as fruits of election, he
at length concludes that he had acted with such liberality, “because
he remembered his covenant.”[452]
Consistent with this
doctrine is the song of the whole Church: “Thy right hand,
and thine arm, and the light of thy countenance, gave our fathers
the land, because thou hadst a favour unto them.”[453]
It must be observed that where mention is made of the land,
it is a visible symbol of the secret separation, which comprehends
adoption. David, in another place, exhorts the people
to the same gratitude: “Blessed is the nation whose God is
the Lord; and the people whom he hath chosen for his own
inheritance.”[454]
Samuel animates to a good hope: “The
Lord will not forsake his people, for his great name’s sake;
because it hath pleased the Lord to make you his people.”[455]
David, when his faith is assailed, thus arms himself for the
conflict: “Blessed is the man whom thou choosest, and causest
to approach unto thee; he shall dwell in thy courts.”[456]
But since the election hidden in God has been confirmed by
the first deliverance, as well as by the second and other intermediate
blessings, the word choose is transferred to it in Isaiah:
“The Lord will have mercy on Jacob, and will yet choose
Israel;”[457]
because, contemplating a future period, he declares
that the collection of the residue of the people, whom he had
appeared to have forsaken, would be a sign of the stable and
sure election, which had likewise seemed to fail. When he
says also, in another place, “I have chosen thee, and not cast
thee away,”[458]
he commends the continual course of his signal
liberality and paternal benevolence. The angel, in Zechariah,
speaks more plainly: “The Lord shall choose Jerusalem
again;”[459]
as though his severe chastisement had been a
rejection, or their exile had been an interruption of election;
which, nevertheless, remains inviolable, though the tokens of
it are not always visible.