Institutes of the Christian Religion (Vol. 2 of 2)
A Refutation Of The Injurious Calumnies Of The Papists Against This Doctrine - Reading 02
III. These few instances, indeed, I have given as a specimen;
for if I were disposed to quote every particular passage,
I should produce a large volume. The apostles are quite full
of admonitions, exhortations, and reproofs, to “furnish the man
of God unto all good works,”[118]
and that without any mention
of merit. But they rather deduce their principal exhortations
from this consideration, That our salvation depends not
on any merit of ours, but merely on the mercy of God. As
Paul, after having very largely shown that we can have no
hope of life, but from the righteousness of Christ, when he
proceeds to exhortations, beseeches us “by the mercies of
God” with which we have been favoured.[119]
And indeed
this one reason ought to be enough; that God may be glorified
in us.[120]
But if any persons be not so powerfully affected
by the glory of God, yet the remembrance of his benefits
should be amply sufficient to incite them to rectitude of conduct.
But these men, who by the obtrusion of merit extort
some servile and constrained acts of obedience to the law, are
guilty of falsehood when they affirm that we have no arguments
to enforce the practice of good works, because we do
not proceed in the same way; as though, truly, such obedience
were very pleasing to God, who declares that he “loveth
a cheerful giver;” and forbids any thing to be given “grudgingly,
or of necessity.”[121]
Nor do I say this, because I either
reject or neglect that kind of exhortation, which the Scripture
frequently uses, that no method of animating us to our duty
may be omitted. It mentions the reward which “God will
render to every man according to his works;”[122]
but that
this is the only argument, or the principal one, I deny. In
the next place, I assert that we ought not to begin with it.
Moreover, I contend that it has no tendency to establish the
merit preached by these men, as we shall afterwards see; and,
lastly, that it is entirely useless, unless preceded by this doctrine,
That we are justified solely on account of the merit of
Christ, apprehended by faith, and not on account of any merit
in our own works; because none can be capable of the pursuit
of holiness, but such as have previously imbibed this doctrine.
This sentiment is beautifully suggested by the Psalmist when
he thus addresses the Lord: “There is forgiveness with thee,
that thou mayest be feared;”[123]
for he shows that there is no
worship of God without an acknowledgment of his mercy, on
which alone it is both founded and established. And this well
deserves to be remarked, in order that we may know, not only
that the true worship of God arises from a reliance on his
mercy, but that the fear of God (which the Papists hold to be
meritorious) cannot be dignified with the title of merit, because
it is founded in the pardon and remission of sins.
IV. But the most futile of all their calumnies is, that men
are encouraged to the practice of sin by our maintaining the
gratuitous remission of sins, in which we make righteousness to
consist. For we say that so great a blessing could never be
compensated by any virtue of ours, and that therefore it could
never be obtained, unless it were gratuitously bestowed; moreover,
that it is gratuitous to us indeed, but not so to Christ,
whom it cost so much, even his own most sacred blood, beside
which no price sufficiently valuable could be paid to Divine
justice. When men are taught in this manner, they are apprized
that it is not owing to them that this most sacred blood
is not shed as often as they sin. Besides, we learn that such
is our pollution, that it can never be washed away, except in
the fountain of this immaculate blood. Must not persons who
hear these things conceive a greater horror of sin, than if it
were said to be cleansed by a sprinkling of good works? And
if they have any fear of God, will they not dread, after being
once purified, to plunge themselves again into the mire, and
thereby to disturb and infect, as far as they can, the purity of
this fountain? “I have washed my feet,” (says the believing
soul in Solomon,) “how shall I defile them?”[124]
Now, it is
plain which party better deserves the charge of degrading the
value of remission of sins, and prostituting the dignity of
righteousness. They pretend that God is appeased by their
frivolous satisfactions, which are no better than dung; we
assert, that the guilt of sin is too atrocious to be expiated by
such insignificant trifles; that the displeasure of God is too
great to be appeased by these worthless satisfactions; and
therefore that this is the exclusive prerogative of the blood of
Christ. They say, that righteousness, if it ever be defective,
is restored and repaired by works of satisfaction. We think it
so valuable that no compensation of works can be adequate to
it; and therefore that for its restitution we must have recourse
to the mercy of God alone. The remaining particulars that
pertain to the remission of sins may be found in the next
chapter.