Institutes of the Christian Religion (Vol. 2 of 2)
CHAPTER XI.04
The Jurisdiction Of The Church, And Its Abuse Under The Papacy - Reading 04
VIII. Though we have not said all that might be adduced
for this purpose, and what we have said has been condensed
within a small compass, yet I trust we have so refuted our
adversaries, as to leave no room for any one to doubt that the
spiritual power arrogated by the pope and all his hierarchy, is
a tyrannical usurpation, chargeable with impious opposition to
the word of God, and injustice to his people. Under the term
spiritual power, I include their audacity in fabricating new
doctrines, by which they have seduced the unhappy people
from the native purity of the word of God, the iniquitous
traditions by which they have insnared them, and the pretended
ecclesiastical jurisdiction which they exercise by their suffragans,
vicars, penitentiaries, and officials. For if we allow Christ any
kingdom among us, all this kind of domination must immediately
fall to the ground. The power of the sword, which they
also claim, as that is not exercised over consciences, but operates
on property, is irrelevant to our present subject; though in this
also it is worth while to remark, that they are always consistent
with themselves, and are at the greatest possible distance from
the character they would be thought to sustain, as pastors of
the Church. Here I am not censuring the particular vices of
individuals, but the general wickedness and common pest of
the whole order, which they would consider as degraded, if
it were not distinguished by wealth and lofty titles. If we
consult the authority of Christ on this subject, there is no doubt
that he intended to exclude the ministers of his word from civil
dominion and secular sovereignty, when he said, “The kings
of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them; but it shall not
be so among you.” [1037]
IX. But since a method has been contrived for bishops to
retain the title, honour, and emoluments of their office without
any burden or solicitude, that they might not be left entirely
without occupation, the power of the sword has been given to
them, or rather they have usurped it to themselves. With what
plea will they defend such impudence? Was it for bishops
to perplex themselves with judicial proceedings, to assume the
government of cities and provinces, and to undertake various
other occupations so incompatible with their office, which alone
would furnish them so much labour and employment, that even
if they were entirely and assiduously devoted to it, without the
least distraction of other avocations, they would scarcely be
able to discharge its functions? But they have the hardihood
to boast, that this causes the Church of Christ to flourish with a
glory suitable to its dignity, and at the same time that they
are not too much distracted from the duties of their vocation.
With respect to the first point, if it be a becoming ornament
of the sacred office, for those who sustain it to be elevated to a
degree of power formidable to the greatest monarchs, they have
reason to expostulate with Christ, by whom their honour has
been so grievously wounded. For in their opinion, at least,
what could have been said more disgraceful than the following
language? “The kings of the Gentiles exercise dominion
over them; but it shall not be so among you.” [1038] [1039] [1040]
X. It has, without doubt, been from small beginnings, that
they have gradually risen to such eminence. For it was not possible
for them to make so great an advance at one step. But
sometimes by fraudulent and secret artifices, they exalted themselves
in a clandestine manner, so that no one perceived the encroachment
till it had been effected: sometimes, when opportunity
offered, by terrifying and menacing princes, they extorted
from them some augmentation of their power; sometimes, when
they saw princes inclined to favour them, they abused their foolish
and inconsiderate pliability. In early times, if any controversy
arose, the believers, in order to avoid the necessity of litigation,
used to refer it to the decision of their bishop, of whose
integrity they were fully satisfied. The ancient bishops were
frequently embarrassed with such arbitrations, which exceedingly
displeased them, as Augustine somewhere declares; but
to save the parties from lawsuits, they reluctantly undertook this
troublesome business. From voluntary arbitrations, which were
entirely different from the processes of civil courts, their successors
have erected an ordinary jurisdiction. In a subsequent period,
when cities and countries were oppressed with various distresses,
they had recourse to the patronage of their bishops, that
they might be protected by their influence; succeeding bishops,
by wonderful artifice, of protectors have made themselves lords.
Nor can it be denied, that the principal acquisitions they have
made, have been effected by faction and violence. The princes,
who voluntarily invested the bishops with jurisdiction, were
actuated to this by various motives. But though their indulgence
may have exhibited some appearance of piety, yet their
preposterous liberality was by no means adapted to promote the
benefit of the Church, the ancient and genuine discipline of
which they thereby corrupted, or rather, to say the truth, utterly
annihilated. But those bishops who have abused such kindness
of princes to their own profit, have sufficiently evinced, by this
one specimen, that they were in reality no bishops at all. For
if they had possessed a particle of the apostolic spirit, they
would unquestionably have answered, in the language of Paul,
that “the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but” [1041]