Institutes of the Christian Religion (Vol. 2 of 2)
CHAPTER XIV.04
The Commencement And Continual Progress Of Justification - Reading 04
X. In the next place, even though it were possible for us to
perform any works completely pure and perfect, yet one sin is
sufficient to extinguish and annihilate all remembrance of antecedent
righteousness, as is declared by the prophet. [35] [36]
XI. We must strenuously insist on these two points—first,
that there never was an action performed by a pious man,
which, if examined by the scrutinizing eye of Divine justice,
would not deserve condemnation; and secondly, if any such
thing be admitted, (though it cannot be the case with any individual
of mankind,) yet being corrupted and contaminated by
the sins, of which its performer is confessedly guilty, it loses
every claim to the Divine favour. And this is the principal
hinge on which our controversy [with the Papists] turns. For
concerning the beginning of justification, there is no dispute
between us and the sounder schoolmen, but we all agree, that a
sinner being freely delivered from condemnation obtains righteousness,
and that by the remission of his sins; only they,
under the term justification, comprehend that renovation in
which we are renewed by the Spirit of God to an obedience to
the law, and so they describe the righteousness of a regenerate
man as consisting in this—that a man, after having been once
reconciled to God through faith in Christ, is accounted righteous
with God on account of his good works, the merit of
which is the cause of his acceptance. But the Lord, on the
contrary, declares, “that faith was reckoned to Abraham for
righteousness,” [37] [38] [39] [40] [41]
XII. The subterfuges, by which the schoolmen endeavour to evade these arguments, are unavailing. They say, that the sufficiency of good works to justification arises not from their intrinsic merit, but from the grace through which they are accepted. Secondly, because they are constrained to acknowledge the righteousness of works to be always imperfect in the present state, they admit, that as long as we live we need the remission of our sins, in order to supply the defects of our works; but that our deficiencies are compensated by works of supererogation. I reply, that what they denominate the grace through which our works are accepted, is no other than the free goodness of the Father, with which he embraces us in Christ, when he invests us with the righteousness of Christ, and accepts it as ours, in order that, in consequence of it, he may treat us as holy, pure, and righteous persons. For the righteousness of Christ (which, being the only perfect righteousness, is the only one that can bear the Divine scrutiny) must be produced on our behalf, and judicially presented, as in the case of a surety. Being furnished with this, we obtain by faith the perpetual remission of our sins. Our imperfections and impurities, being concealed by its purity, are not imputed to us, but are as it were buried, and prevented from appearing in the view of Divine justice, till the advent of that hour, when the old man being slain and utterly annihilated in us, the Divine goodness shall receive us into a blessed peace with the new Adam, in that state to wait for the day of the Lord, when we shall receive incorruptible bodies, and be translated to the glories of the celestial kingdom.